A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate Factors Affecting the Decision to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination in 267 Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Poland.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to assess the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and the attitudes toward receiving COVID-19 vaccination among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Poland. An important aim of the study was to determine why some people get vaccinated and others refuse to do so. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a single-center, prospective survey. The study included 267 IBD patients who agreed to complete an anonymous questionnaire comprising 31 questions. RESULTS We found that 71.2% of the IBD patients had been vaccinated. The history of COVID-19 was associated with a lower vaccination rate (16.9% vs 36.8%; P=0.001), regardless of IBD severity. In the vaccinated group, there were more vaccinated people among household members (90.4% vs 43.4%; p<0.001) and friends (52.9% vs 22.4%; P<0.001). Family safety (71.1%), the desire to avoid COVID-19 (67.9%), social responsibility (60.5%), the desire to return to normal life (51.6%), and faith in vaccination as such (43.2%) were the most common reasons for vaccination. The most common cause of non-vaccination was concern about adverse effects (50.0%), including long-term adverse effects (36.8%), and about the possible exacerbation of gastroenterological disease (34.2%). CONCLUSIONS IBD patients are more likely to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 than the rest of the population in Poland. Young age, low socioeconomic status, low education, and living in the countryside were factors associated with lower vaccination rates. Family and friends had the greatest influence on the decision to vaccinate, but the influence of the mass media was very small.

Social Distancing during COVID-19 Pandemic among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

(1) Background: Social distancing rules have been widely introduced in the fight against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. So far, the effectiveness of these methods has not been assessed in the group of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. (2) Methods: The study included 473 patients with IBD who made 1180 hospital visits from 1 May to 30 September 2020. During each visit, the patients completed a five-step, progressive scale that was developed to assess the degree of social isolation. In parallel, other demographic data were collected and the concentrations of anti-severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG and IgM+IgA antibodies were measured using the ELISA method. (3) Results: The study found a significant correlation between the degree of social distancing and the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the groups with the lowest degree of isolation (3 to 5). (4) Conclusions: Maintaining social distancing is an effective method for reducing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus among IBD patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with higher seroprevalence rates of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: According to the current data, there has been no increase in the incidence of COVID­19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVES: The available data are based on symptomatic cases and do not include the asymptomatic ones. To measure the exact infection rate, we initiated a study that aimed to assess the seroprevalence of anti-SARS­CoV­2 antibodies in IBD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 864 individuals were enrolled in the study, including 432 patients with IBD (290 with Crohn disease and 142 with ulcerative colitis) and 432 controls without IBD (healthcare professionals) matched for age and sex. Serum samples were prospectively collected, and the presence of anti-SARS­CoV­2 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM + IgA antibodies were measured using the enzyme­linked immunoassay method (Vircell Microbiologists). RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of positive results for anti-SARS­CoV­2 antibodies, both in the IgG and IgM + IgA class, was found in patients with IBD (4.6% and 6%, respectively, compared with 1.6% and 1.1%, respectively, in controls; both P values <0.05). No patient had symptomatic COVID­19. There was no association among patients' age, sex, drugs used for IBD, or disease activity and the occurrence of IgG antibodies. CONCLUSION: Patients with IBD may be at higher risk of developing SARS­CoV­2 infection, defined as the presence of elevated levels of anti-SARS­CoV­2 IgG antibodies, but not of having a symptomatic and / or severe course of COVID­19 compared with healthcare professionals without IBD.

Addressing multiple gastroenterological aspects of coronavirus disease 2019.

The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID­19) pandemic has become the biggest challenge for the whole human community since many years. It seems that the proper identification of all people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) is the best strategy to limit the transmission. However, in a significant proportion of patients, there are no clinical manifestations of the disease, and symptoms may be very mild or atypical. There is a growing body of evidence that digestive manifestations of COVID­19 are frequently reported and may precede typical respiratory symptoms. Moreover, SARS­CoV­2 particles were found in the gastrointestinal epithelial cells, and viral RNA was detected in the feces of patients with COVID­19. These data suggest that gastrointestinal symptoms in COVID­19 are not accidental findings and they may result from direct digestive involvement. Patients with new­onset diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting without any other evident etiological factors should be tested for SARS­CoV­2 infection. Gastroenterologists and members of other medical specialties should also remember that the current epidemiological situation has changed diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms in the management of several gastrointestinal and liver disorders. This review article summarizes the currently available data on multiple gastroenterological aspects of COVID­19 and provides information on practical recommendations and position statements of the most prominent associations in the field of gastroenterology, which appeared in response to the emergence of the pandemic.